Is a lawyer who failed to adequately represent his client entitled to a three-month suspension?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Law Society of Upper Canada v. Francesco Puchiele, 2011 ONLSHP 73 (CanLII):

In Law Society of Upper Canada v. Spodek, [1996] L.S.D.D. No. 176, the lawyer failed to adequately represent his client. The hearing panel accepted a joint submission that a three-month suspension be served by way of penalty. That precedent is inapplicable.

Other Questions


Is a person entitled under a statutory superannuation scheme entitled to a garnishment under the Employee Benefit Scheme entitled to be garnished after they have ceased employment? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a client entitled to an interim assessment of their solicitor's client's interim account? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a husband’s phone conversation with a lawyer on his cell phone about the possibility of him representing his wife preclude him from retaining the same lawyer later? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the factors for assessing penalty when a lawyer has failed to be on guard against being duped by clients intent on fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a solicitor and client entitled to costs on a solicitor-and-client scale? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a lawyer be found ungovernable for failing to co-operate or respond to a complaint from five different clients? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a self-represented litigant entitled to the same costs as a lawyer? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of the Court of Appeal’s decision not to bar a lawyer from representing a client in a personal injury matter? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for rebutting the presumption that a client is entitled to an assessment if their solicitor is still representing them? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a self-represented litigant entitled to recover costs from the other party? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.