Is a third party dealing with a corporation not required to ensure that all internal regulations have been complied with where a document is regular on its face?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Toronto Dominion Bank v. Coopers & Lybrand Limited, 1982 CanLII 1125 (AB QB):

Royal Br. Bank v. Turquand (1856), 6 E.&B. 327, 119 E.R. 886 (Ex. Ch.), has long been quoted as authority for the proposition that a third party dealing with a corporation is not required to ensure that all the internal regulations of the company have, in fact, been complied with where a document is regular on its face.

Other Questions


Are high ratio mortgage lenders who fail to comply with section 2 of the LPA Regulation, or do not comply with the High Ratio Statement? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a party who is not an applicant in a restrictive covenant action against a party that is not a party to the restrictive covenant? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining that a mortgage agreement does not require the borrower to obtain financing from a third party? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a third party holding the record be compelled to produce the record directly or directly? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the duty of the trustees of an estate to accept or reject an increased offer from a third party? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the common law procedure for producing records relating to a complainant or witness in the possession of a third party? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any common law common law concept or common law relation to corporate shields or corporate vale? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a third party claim in a motor vehicle accident? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a settlement be reached before the parties complete the settlement documentation? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a third party notice valid after the expiry of the limitation period? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.