Can a settlement be reached before the parties complete the settlement documentation?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Buterman v. Greater St. Albert Regional Division No. 29, 2014 AHRC 8 (CanLII):

A settlement may be reached by parties before they complete settlement documentation. In Fieguth v. Acklands Ltd.[7], McEachern C.J.B.C. held: In these matters it is necessary to separate the question of formation of contract from its completion. The first question is whether the parties have reached an agreement on all essential terms. There is not usually any difficulty in connection with the settlement of a claim or action for cash. That is what happened here and as a settlement implies a promise to furnish a release and, if there is an action, a consent dismissal unless there is a contractual agreement to the contrary, there was agreement on all essential terms. The next stage is the completion of the agreement. If there are no specific terms in this connection either party is entitled to submit whatever releases or other documentation he thinks appropriate. Ordinary business and professional practice cannot be equated to a game of checkers where a player is conclusively presumed to have made his move the moment he removes his hand from the piece. One can tender whatever documents he thinks appropriate without rescinding the settlement agreement. If such documents are accepted and executed and returned then the contract, which has been executory, becomes executed. If the documents are not accepted then there must be further discussion but neither party is released or discharged unless the other party has demonstrated an unwillingness to be bound by the agreement by insisting upon terms or conditions which have not been agreed upon or are not reasonably implied in these circumstances.

Other Questions


Is a party who is not an applicant in a restrictive covenant action against a party that is not a party to the restrictive covenant? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the basis for the principle that a person who is not a party to the same type of accommodation as a party is entitled to a similar accommodation? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a third party dealing with a corporation not required to ensure that all internal regulations have been complied with where a document is regular on its face? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a municipal counsellor who is alleged to have executed documents after destroying the documents? (Alberta, Canada)
Does Pride have to be a party to the net settlement of the damages award? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the principle of res judicata apply when one party has brought a new cause of action against the same party? (Alberta, Canada)
If there is no clear agency between the parties, can the parties be considered fiduciary? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a court bound by law to award costs in favour of the successful party against the unsuccessful party? (Alberta, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a party who sent a letter suggesting a settlement be used as Exhibit K in an affidavit? (Alberta, Canada)
Under what circumstances will a party be permitted to enter into an agreement for sale without the consent of the other party? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.