Neither of the parties discussed the applicable standard of review. The issue is a question of law involving the interpretation of sections 28 and 29 of the Act in light of the 1976 Convention. The issue is therefore subject to review on a standard of correctness (Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33,  2 S.C.R. 235, at paragraph 8). Analysis
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.