Both parties agree that the standard of review, as articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen (2002), 2002 SCC 33 (CanLII), 211 D.L.R. (4th) 577 (S.C.C.) is applicable to the present case. That is, for questions of law, the standard is correctness. For questions of mixed fact and law it is palpable and overriding error, unless a distinct error of law can be extricated from the question, in which case correctness would again be the standard on that specific question. Issue 1 Material Date for Considering Infringement of a Registered Trademark
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.