Given the highly discretionary and exceptional nature of s. 24 relief, the standard of review is reasonableness with deference accorded to factual findings and the weighing of factors (Farhat, above). Issues of procedural fairness generally and in this case in particular are reviewed on a standard of correctness (Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.