As to the standard of review applicable to the respondent, the petitioners say that based on Ennis v. Canada (Attorney General), 2003 FCT 461, decisions regarding the internal management of the penitentiary system will not likely be interfered with unless there are formal defects, a breach of natural justice, excess of jurisdiction or a finding of fact made in an irrational or vexatious manner. They submit that the respondent’s interpretation of the CCRA and his application of the unwritten centralized process meet the criterion for review described in that decision.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.