What is the standard of review for questions of law, credibility, mixed fact and law and penalty?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Law Society of Upper Canada v. Nguyen, 2016 ONLSTA 9 (CanLII):
For questions of law, the standard of review is correctness. For questions of fact, credibility, mixed fact and law and penalty, the standard of review is reasonableness. The standard of review for the reasons and the decision as a whole is reasonableness. (See Law Society of Upper Canada v. Melnick, 2013 ONLSAP 27 (CanLII) at para. 10.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review of questions of law and questions of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a question of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for appeal from a judge on questions of law and mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for questions of mixed law and fact? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a question of fact and mixed fact? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the distinction between questions of law, questions of fact and questions of mixed law and fact? (Ontario, Canada)
What is a palpable error in the standard of review applicable to questions of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between questions of law and questions of mixed law and fact? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a judicial decision on a question of law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review on appeal involving a question of law? (Ontario, Canada)
