What is a palpable error in the standard of review applicable to questions of mixed fact and law?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Burridge v. Hardy, 2018 ONSC 202 (CanLII):

With respect to the standard of review applicable to questions of fact or mixed fact and law, a palpable error is one that is obvious, plain to see, or clear. Examples of such an error include: findings made in the complete absence of evidence; findings made in conflict with accepted evidence; findings based on a misapprehension of the evidence; and findings of fact drawn from primary evidence that are the result of speculation rather than inference: see Housen, at paras. 6 and 23; Waxman v. Waxman, 2004 CanLII 39040 at para. 296, 186 O.A.C. 201.

An error is overriding when it carries with it sufficient significance so as to vitiate the challenged finding of fact. Where the challenged finding of fact is based on a constellation of findings, the conclusion that one or more of those findings is founded on a palpable error does not automatically render the error an “overriding” one. To be “overriding,” the error must go to the root of the challenged finding of fact, such that the fact cannot safely stand in the face of that error: see Schwartz v. Canada, 1996 CanLII 217 (SCC), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 254, at paras. 34–35.

Other Questions


What is the legal test for applying palpable and overriding error standard in appellate review of findings of fact and of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review of questions of law and questions of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to questions of procedural fairness? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for appeal from a judge on questions of law and mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the distinction between questions of law, questions of fact and questions of mixed law and fact? (Ontario, Canada)
When a judge has made an error in principle by failing to consider the relevant elements of a legal test or standard, or has erred in the application or standard? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a question of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law relating to an accident benefit application where a delay in submitting the Application due to a personal relationship preventing the Applicant from making an application? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for questions of law, credibility, mixed fact and law and penalty? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an error of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.