What is the standard of review for credibility findings?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Buzi v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 986 (CanLII):
The standard of review for credibility findings has been held to be patent unreasonableness. (Aguebor v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1993), 160 N.R. 315) I adopt that standard of review.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If a court finds that a plaintiff has been denied a right to sue under a different legal standard than under the current standard of care, can the finding be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the applicable standard of review for findings of credibility? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard review of credibility findings in employment law? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appeal of a finding made after a trial? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a finding of fact? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review in the context of a judicial review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review and what is the deference required to review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the presumption of reasonableness review automatically engage with correctness standards of review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
