What is the standard of pleading comprehension in a criminal case?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Goodnough, 2017 ONCJ 924 (CanLII):

[46] However, as we shall see, the standard and in this case, as it was in Regina v. Moser, supra, is academic. It is argued that there are four deficiencies in plea comprehension that alone or together invalidate the applicant’s plea of guilty. 1) the plea was not voluntary, he was persuaded to plea; 2) the plea was not unequivocal; 3) the plea was not informed; and 4) the applicant did not understand the legal consequences of the plea.

Other Questions


What is the standard of pleading in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a defendant's criminal record admissible in a criminal case? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a pleading containing claims of misrepresentation be pleaded more particularity than other pleadings? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that states that parties are not aware of the effect of the case on the other side? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the factors that apply when a party seeks to plead to a finding that a party has not followed the 5 factors in its pleading? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that a judge should consider some of the issues before the trial of the others? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the authorities treated the absence of evidence of proof of motive in a criminal case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law on expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for combining pleadings in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any authority for the proposition that it is the standard of an ordinary, right-thinking member of society that is a reasonable standard of conduct for assessing the impact of an offensive statement? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.