What is the relevant facts for the second time?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from McIlvenna v. Viebig, 2013 BCCA 411 (CanLII):
On February 27, 2009, the appellant filed an Affidavit of Attainment of Majority stating he intended to “act in this action without a litigation guardian.” The second trial took place between August 30 and September 3, 2010. It was re-opened (McIlvenna v. Viebig, 2011 BCSC 57) and additional hearings took place on March 16 and July 19, 2011. The action again was dismissed on February 14, 2012 (McIlvenna v. Viebig, 2012 BCSC 218).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the relevant time that is relevant in determining whether a dominant driver was or should have been aware of the collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant time frame for calculating a delay under s. 11(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada for the purpose of computing a reasonable trial within a reasonable time? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a discount for time served under section 344(a) of the Criminal Code apply to time served time served? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate amount of time for an applicant to conduct a full-time interview for a second degree degree course? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant period of time between the date of the Accident and the time of trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant material facts in a pleading under Rule 3-7(18) of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court consider relevancy of the relevant questions in a case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for extending the time for filing a counterclaim after the time has expired? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the critical time for a minority-time parent to access a child? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of reducing the amount of time a minority-time parent has to spend with her child under s. 9 of the Child Support Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
