What is the effect of the Scrutin 3 scale 3 to compensate for "average" or "ordinary" difficulty?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Baker v. Baker, 2001 BCSC 324 (CanLII):
Scale 3 was intended to compensate for "average" or "ordinary" difficulty and as Low J. (as he then was) observed in Gillis v. Kralj (supra), even if a case is " fairly complicated" and involve “substantial preparation”, it may nevertheless be a case of ordinary difficulty.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of long-term disability benefits when a plaintiff is dismissed on the grounds that the employer is having economic difficulties? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for being of more than ordinary difficulty? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of an injunction restraining the wife from selling, disposing of or voting her shares in a company to effect a sale or disposal of the assets of the company? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a compensable injury must be the sole cause of a disability before compensation is payable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the "difficulty" level of difficulty of a proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for compensability under section 5.1(b) of the Workers’ Compensation Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What authority is available to determine when psychological or emotional effects of an accident are compensable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a workplace injury to be a compensable one in workers’ compensation law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What the ordinary man would infer from what is said to be the "natural and ordinary meaning" of the words? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a common law common law agreement where the parties have reached an agreement stating that if the parties reconcile, will the common law rule remain in effect even if they reconcile? (British Columbia, Canada)
