There have come to be accepted a series of criteria that can properly be considered in assessing the level of difficulty of a proceeding. These were helpfully set out by Wilson J. in Mort v. Saanich School Board No. 63, 2001 BCSC 1473 at para 6: (a) the length of the hearing on the substantive point; (b) the “complexity of the issues involved”; (c) the number and complexity of pre-trial or hearing applications; (d) whether the proceeding was “hard-fought”, with little or nothing having been conceded along the way; (e) the “number and length of examinations for discovery”; (f) the “number and complexity of experts’ reports”; and (g) the extent of the effort required in fact gathering and proof.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.