Is a breach of the rules of natural justice a ground to quash a decision of a consensual tribunal?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Boucher v. Métis Nation of Alberta Association, 2009 ABCA 5 (CanLII):
It is argued that breach of the rules of natural justice would also be a ground to quash a decision of a private consensual tribunal: see Lakeside v. Hofer, supra. I do not have to decide whether that proposition of law is correct or not, because I see no such breach here.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is an administrative tribunal bound by the rules of fairness and natural justice? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for breach of natural justice? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the purpose of Rule 217 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a "patently unreasonable" decision at the Canadian import tribunal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the case law on natural justice and due process? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the role of the Rules of Civil Procedure in the administration of civil justice in Canada? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision of the administrative tribunal? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a member of a municipal council be disqualified from office for a breach of the pecuniary interest rules? (Alberta, Canada)
Does s. 7(e) of the Canadian Bill of Rights require the courts to observe "natural justice" in the context of conflict of law cases? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision by an administrative tribunal? (Alberta, Canada)
