My objective is therefore to review the RPD’s decision for ‘reasonableness’ which is defined in the jurisprudence as “…concerned mostly with the existence of justification, transparency and intelligibility within the decision-making process. But it is also concerned with whether the decision falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law”. This understanding flows from Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190. NEW EVIDENCE
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.