Given the sanction that may be imposed and the nature of the evidence in question, it is my opinion that the opportunity of the defendant to cross-examine the veterinarian is critical to ensuring trial fairness. Section 19 is silent as to whether there is a right to cross-examine. While it does not expressly provide for such a right, neither does it expressly preclude or limit it, as was the case in Waterloo v. Yan. The issue, then, is whether the absence of an explicit provision for cross-examination means that the defendant does not have a right to cross-examine.
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.