What is the correct approach on an application for damages under R. 18A?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from GL&V Canada Inc. v. Deramore Construction Services Inc., 2015 BCSC 2534 (CanLII):

Our Court of Appeal recently summarized the correct approach on such an application as follows in Harrison v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2010 BCCA 220 at para. 40: The trial judge was required to grant judgment if the evidence adduced on the R. 18A application provided the facts necessary to decide the issue of liability, and it would not have been unjust to do so. It is not a question of whether a full trial could conceivably “turn something up” or produce a different result.

Other Questions


What is the correct approach on an application such as this? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a strata’s approach to the application significantly unfair to the applicant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an applicant file a separate claim against a third party for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court issue a special levy to repair a damaged or damaged property? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the applicable law governing responsibility for water damage between strata lot owners? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the proper measure of damages for damages where a defect in a motor vehicle is not disclosed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge have a duty to hear an application where the adjudicator of the application has been found in error? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will be considered in determining entitlement to damages under the head of damage? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the correct approach to proving hypothetical events? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application to dismiss on an interlocutory application be dismissed? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.