Our Court of Appeal recently summarized the correct approach on such an application as follows in Harrison v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development), 2010 BCCA 220 at para. 40: The trial judge was required to grant judgment if the evidence adduced on the R. 18A application provided the facts necessary to decide the issue of liability, and it would not have been unjust to do so. It is not a question of whether a full trial could conceivably “turn something up” or produce a different result.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.