Is a strata’s approach to the application significantly unfair to the applicant?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Yang v. The Owners, Strata Plan VR732, 2020 BCCRT 361 (CanLII):
71. I am empowered under section 123(2) of the Act to make orders related to findings of significant unfairness: see Torok v. Amstutz et al 2019 BCCRT 386. As discussed further below, I find the strata’s approach has been significantly unfair to the applicant.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a 3/4 vote of the Owner of a strata bylaw 16.1 violate the Owner's expectation that strata council positions will not be allotted by strata lot type? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a majority of owners of a residential strata have voted to replace a carpet under their strata, can they force the strata to do so? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the meaning of “significantly unfair” in Strata Plan law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What defines a significantly unfair strata plan? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a strata corporation's delay in informing its owners of a lawsuit against the strata is in breach of section 167(1) of the BC Strata Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for significant unfairness in a strata plan? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a section of Strata Plan charge back costs incurred by an individual strata for damage caused to a strata lot? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test used to answer whether a strata’s allocation of common expenses is significantly unfair to the owner? (British Columbia, Canada)
What constitutes significant unfairness under s. 164 of the Strata Plan? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the definition of “significantly unfair” in s. 164 of the Strata Property Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
