How have the courts treated the issue of return of purchase money?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Armstrong v. Nason, 1894 CanLII 22 (ON CA):
As to the return of the purchase money:—I do not think that the case derives any benefit from the principles laid down in the very peculiar case of Soper v. Arnold, 37 Ch. D. 96.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal finding on the "live issue" in the context of the issue? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts treated the issue of substantial prejudice in cases involving good faith and substantial prejudice? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts treated the issue of satisfactory title and escrowing of a mortgage? (Ontario, Canada)
Does this court have jurisdiction to issue a stay of a deportation order pursuant to section 134(2) of the Courts of Justice Act? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts treated the issue of encumbrances on real estate? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the principles of the Court of Arbitration for the purpose of making decisions at an arbitrator rather than the court? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts treated the issue of a proposed duty of care in a motor vehicle accident case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts treated the issue of conflict of interest in elections? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court treated the issue of credibility in the trial of a witness in a dog case? (Ontario, Canada)
Can issue estoppel prevent parties from re-litigating issues previously decided in another court proceeding? (Ontario, Canada)
