The Respondent was not at liberty to ignore his professional obligations simply because of TIC’s instructions. That principle is drawn from Law Society of Upper Canada v. Di Francesco, [2003] LSDD No. 44. That panel held at paragraph 26 that: The member had an obligation not to allow himself to be a mere unquestioning instrument of his client’s wishes …
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.