Is reduced wages a detriment to the respondent?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Wilson v. Fotsch, 2010 BCCA 226 (CanLII):
As noted, I also question whether the receipt of reduced wages was a detriment to the respondent. Although Cory J. stated in Peter v. Beblow that detriment likely invariably follows benefit, I do not take that to be absolutely the case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a respondent respond to an application with a sur-reply responding to new issues raised in reply? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that the respondent did not expect the respondent to pay for the domestic services provided by the Respondent have any impact on an unjust enrichment claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent responded to an application for a change in parenting time? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a Law Society of BC appeal against a decision that the Respondent failed to respond over a four-month period? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have an obligation to reduce their damages by reducing the damages in the context of a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a claim of negligent misrepresentation or detrimental reliance require detrimental reliance? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order costs in favour of the respondent against the respondent by counterclaim? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent dealt with a default judgment in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a Respondent have accepted the jurisdiction of the Court as a result of the Respondent's failure to attend the hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a law firm representing the respondent in a personal injury action be restrained from acting for the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
