How has the court in India assessed an offer made to a private member of a professional club?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Urbanczyk v 1128 Enterprises Ltd., 2019 BCSC 649 (CanLII):
The reasonableness of the offer must be assessed at the time the offer was made and thereafter. The court should consider the circumstances that existed when the offer was made, and it should consider the information the parties were aware of at all relevant times: Meghji v. Lee, 2014 BCCA 105 at para. 112.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the Court in England and Wales assessed the final stage of the Court of Appeal's final assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
In assessing the reasonableness of a registrar's assessment, how has the registrar conducted her assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a class member entitled to an opt-out from a settlement offer made directly to the class member? (British Columbia, Canada)
When assessing future earning capacity, when assessing loss of future earnings capacity, has the court ever considered a loss of income projection or projection? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BC Supreme Court treated the quantum assessment trial of a plaintiff in a quantum assessment case? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts in India assessed the impact of a motor vehicle accident on an individual's income estimates for the purposes of calculating their income potential? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a covenant that prohibits non-members of a club from occupying the premises of the club only if they have special permission? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have concurrent jurisdiction with the federal court to assess decisions of a band council? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of B.C holding that the Court has jurisdiction to determine whether a person who is not a party to a particular type of tortfeasor has a valid claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
