In R v. Dillon[1], Hill J. stated that the reasonableness of the notice respecting certificate evidence must be assessed in light of the purposes of the notice. He listed the following purposes for consideration: (1) to enable the accused person to know precisely the nature of the case against him or her thereby providing an adequate opportunity to make full answer and defence; (2) the notice must be precise and accurate and reasonably certain so that an accused person is alerted with certainty as to the procedure to be invoked; (3) to permit adequate deliberation time as to whether an application to the court ought to be made for an order requiring attendance of the analyst for the purpose of cross-examination; (4) simplifying the production of evidence; and (5) reducing the time and cost of criminal prosecutions.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.