Prowse J.A. went on to quote La Forest J. on the effect of these rules in Tolofson v. Jensen, 1994 CanLII 44 (SCC), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 1022 at 1049. In that case, La Forest J. noted that these rules prevent courts' over-reaching themselves. The real and substantial connection test provides a way to prevent a court from unduly entering into matters with which it has little connection. Operating alongside this test, the forum non conveniens doctrine allows the court to exercise its discretion to give up jurisdiction where another forum is more appropriate.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.