Do you have to do W.(D) or W.P?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Sampson, 2007 NSSC 96 (CanLII):
There is a fairly recent decision The Queen v. C.L.Y. (2006) N.S.J. No. 398 that discusses the W.(D). case and the fact that when you are doing the W.(D). case and applying the three-step approach you do not have to do it in any particular order to get it right, but you have to do it.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of new legislation on the interpretation and application of the new legislation? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is hearsay evidence presumptively inadmissible? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the effect of late disclosure on a motion for summary judgment? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for substantial contribution under section 498 of the Canadian Standards of Civil Procedure and Procedure Act? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on costs for an administrative decision-maker? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the principle of credibility and credibility of a corporation? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an intentionally under-employed person intentionally intentionally seeks to avoid paying child support? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for producing material that is not relevant? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to seek further particulars of relevant facts when the defense of justification and fair comment is bare bones? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
