Inadmissible as offending the rule against hearsay?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Khan v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 1990 CanLII 7943 (ON SCDC):
In my view, those parts of J.'s evidence, as set out in (a) and (b), above, were inadmissible as offending the rule against hearsay: (a) Ratten v. The Queen, [1972] A.C. 378 (P.C.) at pp. 389-90; (b) Khan v. The Queen, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a statement in an affidavit filed on a motion that contains inadmissible hearsay or legal and factual argument best reserved to the factum? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of a decision in Ares v. Venner on hearsay in the context of the hearsay rule? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law on hearsay and hearsay in the context of business records? (Ontario, Canada)
Is hearsay or double-hearsay evidence prejudicial to the applicant's claim against the respondent mother? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that hearsay evidence in an affidavit is hearsay? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for declaring an offender a long-term offender? (Ontario, Canada)
Can hearsay evidence be inadmissible in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on sentencing dangerous offenders? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for holding a young offender accountable under the Youth Criminal Justice Act? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the common law test for admitting a spontaneous or excited utterance as an exception to the hearsay rule? (Ontario, Canada)
