Is a statement made by an accused to a person in authority admissible in evidence?

Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada


The following excerpt is from R v Derouet, 1989 CanLII 3946 (NL CA):

It is clearly established in Canada that statements made by an accused person to a person in authority are not admissible in evidence until they have been shown to have been voluntary (Erven v. The Queen (1978), 1978 CanLII 19 (SCC), 25 N.R. 49; 44 C.C.C.(2d) 76 (S.C.C.)). A voir dire must be conducted.

Other Questions


Does the state of mind of the accused affect the admissibility of a statement by the police? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the legal test for admitting new evidence in a personal injury case? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for finding no conflict of interest between the counsel of the accused and the accused's defence counsel? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for expert opinion evidence in a personal injury case? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Does a police officer need to give notice of presence or authority to enter a person's home? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
How should evidence be considered in a sexual assault trial where the accused testifies? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that a judge failed to address himself to certain relevant evidence? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the difference between general and aggravated damages in a personal injury case? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What are the implications of a long-term, long term relationship on the property of a person who is not in a marriage? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that poor and ignorant persons entitled to a reversionary interest have been induced to sell at an undervalue? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.