What is the basis for a proposed amendment to the statement of defence of champerty and maintenance?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Judith River Farm and Water Ltd. v. Saskatchewan, 2003 SKQB 443 (CanLII):

With respect to the proposed amendment to the statement of defence, none of the material filed discloses a reasonable basis for the proposed defence of champerty and maintenance. Specifically, although the plaintiffs’ arrangements for financing the litigation have permitted the actions to continue, the defendant has no basis for stating that it has led to the “officious intermedling” that is an essential element of champerty and maintenance. The defendants acknowledge that they have no such evidence and that they wish to amend their defence simply to permit inquiries into that possibility at the ongoing examinations for discovery. The need to prohibit that sort of fishing expedition and to focus the litigation on the real issues in dispute is what prompted Zarzeczny J. to make the comments he did in Duke v. Puts, supra.

Other Questions


Does Defendant have to amend his statement of defence to include an allegation that there were 200 acres broken on this land? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is it appropriate for the defence to amend its defence to counterclaim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the defences set up in the statement of defence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be permitted to amend his statement of claim to include an amendment to the original claim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a statement of defence be amended to reflect the decision of the board of arbitration? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When will a court grant leave to amend a deficient statement of claim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When can a defence be amended after the time contemplated under Rules 240 and 241? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a Defendant’s Statement of Defence properly before the court? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a statement of defence stating that an undertaking was a condition to the signing of a bond? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Minister of Health and Social Care have any basis to strike the Statement of Claim in the context of bad faith allegations in paragraph 5 and the rule in Rylands v Fletcher? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.