When the alleged victim is alive and in full possession of his or her faculties, what need is there for a presumption? Thus, in McKay v. Clow, 1941 CanLII 36 (SCC), [1941] S.C.R. 643, the complainant did testify. On his evidence, as described by Crocket J., I do not understand why Crocket J., speaking for the majority, found it necessary to invoke the presumption.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.