This is not a case as in Hutchings v. Dow, 2007 BCCA 148, 66 B.C.L.R. (4th) 78, where there was a combination of two or more tortious causes insufficient in themselves but necessary together to create an indivisible harm such as depression, or, as in Athey v. Leonati, 1996 CanLII 183 (SCC), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458, a disc protrusion. The soft tissue injuries have not been proven to “be of a piece”. Nor is there a separate harm such as depression that has been created by them. The facts support only discrete, time limited soft tissue injuries. The only truly separate cause of injury and loss is the plaintiff’s MS condition which was part of her “original position” and was not initiated, aggravated or accelerated by these motor vehicle accidents.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.