The defence position, in broad overview, is multi-pronged: a) I should not accept the plaintiff’s evidence regarding the existence of an agreement. If I do not accept the evidence, the claim must be dismissed. b) Testamentary autonomy is “a deeply entrenched common law principle” (Spence v. BMO Trust Company., 2016 ONCA 196 at para. 30). Hence, the plaintiff’s allegations should be subjected to significant scrutiny. c) Even if I accept the plaintiff’s evidence, there was insufficient certainty as to the terms. Hence, there was no contract.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.