The respondent submits that the effect of the notice of garnishment is to vary the payout of the matrimonial home sale proceeds as set out in the divorce order and for that reason alone, the notice of garnishment should be set aside. In making this submission the respondent relies primarily on Ruttan v. Ruttan, 1982 CanLII 181 (SCC), [1982] 1 S.C.R. 690 (S.C.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.