The offer was a nominal offer and was clearly made by the defendant as a strategic move to attempt to have the plaintiff settle the claim. Although a nominal offer will not always entitle a successful defendant to double costs if successful at trial, it may be considered in the case of an unmeritorious claim. As Savage J. stated in MacKinlay v. MacKinlay Estate, 2008 BCSC 1570 at para. 34, it is one of the few tools available to a defendant:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.