What is the difference between a true penalty and a forfeiture clause in a contract?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Coronado Developments Ltd. v. W.E.D. Developments Ltd., 1982 CanLII 1255 (AB QB):

A true penalty clause would be one where the vendor seeks to exact an extravagant payment from the party who defaults on a contract, while under a forfeiture clause the vendor would retain money given to him in partial payment. Nonetheless, courts of equity have been willing to classify such forfeiture clauses as being the nature of penalties; Drinkle v. Steedman, supra.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will a party be bound by the elements of a contract where the contract is not enforceable when the contract was signed? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a party who dictates different terms for a contract already formed be considered to be refusing to perform the contract as written? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for equity in a contract where the contract does not contain an equalization clause? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a contract enforceable for breach of contract when the contract is not enforceable? (Alberta, Canada)
Can facts establish a breach of contract and arise from carelessness in the performance of the contract? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word "contract" in the context of an enforceable contract? (Alberta, Canada)
Does an agent have to be personally liable on a contract where the principal of the contract is not personally liable? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a penalty or liquidated damages for breach of contract enforceable? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a contract where a party contracts to cut for a quantity of wood and haul and deliver the wood at a time and to a place mentioned? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the meaning of a contract law case in contract law? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.