What is the test for restoring a person who was removed from office for gross misconduct?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Oberg et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 MBQB 64 (CanLII):

Ultimately, if it is established that the plaintiffs ought not to have been removed from office, they may be restored. There is also authority to the effect that the loss of office itself and to which the officeholder may be entitled do not constitute irreparable harm which cannot be compensated by damages (Weatherill v. Canada (Attorney General) et al. (1998), 1998 CanLII 7320 (FC), 143 F.T.R. 302 at para. 30 (F.C.T.D.)).

Other Questions


Does the clerk of the clerk's office fail to provide the deputy returning officer with two copies of section 276 to 287 inclusive (the sections dealing with corrupt practices)? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does the Attorney General argue that the terms of a personal protection order do not infringe the privacy of the Respondent's right to liberty or security of the person? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for a judge's discretion on costs in a personal injury action? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for determining the range of general damages in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a person be both the prosecutor and judge in a case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for oral evidence in a personal injury action? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a final order be issued in a personal injury matter? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the implications of a plaintiff’s new pleadings in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does a city have to enforce its own building bylaw against a person with knowledge that he is in contraven tion of the bylaw? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the definition of a "factual situation" in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.