The Lawyer argued that a restriction rather than a suspension order should be issued. As was held in Law Society of Upper Canada v. Borkovich:[16] … an interlocutory suspension order represents the most onerous interlocutory order that can be made. As a result, it should be avoided if less onerous restrictions can address the significant risk of harm. Nonetheless, in some cases, the significant risk of harm either to members of the public or to the public interest in the administration of justice can only be addressed through a suspension.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.