What is the test for a party to release a statement of intent in a dispute?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Coburn and Watson’s Metropolitan Home v BMO Financial Group, 2018 BCSC 1183 (CanLII):
Moreover, the law is clear that, while releases are often worded in a broad and general fashion, appearing to cover the end of the world, they must be considered in the context of the dispute. The context often provides a limited background from which an inference may readily be made that the parties meant to apply it only to the claims from the dispute: The Owners, Strata Plan BCS 327 v. IPEX Inc., 2014 BCCA 237 at para. 26.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of the intention or understanding of a party to a transaction where a party intended to transfer a vehicle to another party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the law of agency apply when one party gives explicit or implicit authority to another party (the principal) to enter contracts with third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a party’s intentions were in the context of their intentions in a personal relationship? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party recover in restitution where another party has been unjustly enriched at that party's expense? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party be compelled to sign authorizations for the release of third party records? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party intentionally underemployed or unemployed intentionally imputing income under section 19(1)(a) of the Employment Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a matrimonial dispute, what is the obligation of parties to ensure that their affidavits do not contain hearsay, emotional reactions, or inflammatory statements? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the credibility of the statements given by the drivers in this dispute? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a party can have challenged a foreign court’s procedural defects in that foreign proceeding, can that party collaterally attack the foreign procedural process before the Canadian court at the enforcement stage? (British Columbia, Canada)
