The appellant raises five grounds of appeal related to the jury charge, which can be dealt with summarily. He alleges deficiencies in the charge related to (i) collusion, (ii) similar fact evidence, (iii) evidence on withdrawn counts, (iv) the length, confusing, and unbalanced nature of the charge, and (v) the instruction regarding the rule in Browne v. Dunn. In my view, none of these grounds have any merit.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.