What is the test for appealing on the ground of appeal against a finding that a trial judge committed a palpable and overriding error?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Lakehead Aluminum v. Mauno Parkkari, 2014 ONSC 4167 (CanLII):

The parties agree that this ground of appeal, as a question of mixed fact and law, cannot succeed unless the appellant establishes that the trial judge committed a palpable and overriding error: Housen v. Nikolaisen.

Other Questions


What are the grounds of appeal against the finding that the trial judge erred by failing to consider the circumstantial evidence of impairment? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion to appeal against a finding by a judge at the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority to interfere with a trial judge’s findings of facts? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an appellate court substitute a trial judge’s findings of fact or mixed findings of law with its own? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for applying palpable and overriding error standard in appellate review of findings of fact and of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion of appeal against a finding of fact made by the trial judge? (Ontario, Canada)
What is a jurisdictional error for a preliminary hearing judge to commit a person to trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the grounds on which this court could find that the trial judge erred in exercising their discretion in awarding a costs award? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an appellate court interfere with a lower court’s findings of fact, absent palpable and overriding error? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a Master or Judge in chambers have the power to amend an Order of Appeal where the Master has appealed from the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.