Is a lack of precision in a pleading sufficient to strike the pleading?

British Columbia, Canada

The following excerpt is from Foresters Life Insurance Company v Bingham Group Services Corp., 2019 BCSC 556 (CanLII):

With respect to the Individual Defendants’ argument regarding a lack of particularization of the allegations, a lack of precision is not a proper basis to strike the pleading. As noted by Justice Frankel in Chang Estate v. Chang, 2010 BCCA 111 at para. 50: …Rule 19(11) [now Rule 9-5(1)] must be read in light of Rule 19(11.1) which states that “particulars need only be pleaded to the extent that they are known at the date of pleading, but further particulars may be delivered after they become known”...

Other Questions

On a motion to strike out a pleading, can the court strike out the pleading? (Ontario, Canada)
Is an application to strike out a pleading on the ground it does not disclose a cause of action an attack on the sufficiency of the pleading? (Alberta, Canada)
Does Hoy J. Hoy J’s finding that the conspiracy pleading was sufficient to be considered sufficient? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for an application to strike a claim because it fails to plead sufficient facts? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test on a motion to strike a pleading under Rule 9-5(1)(a)? (British Columbia, Canada)
When will a court strike a pleading against a new defendant? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to amend or strike a pleading? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an order to strike a pleading be made at a settlement conference? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a court strike a pleading under Rule 129(1)(a) for failing to disclose a reasonable cause of action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the remedy for a motion to strike a deficient pleading? (Ontario, Canada)