Furthermore, in Korody v. Bell, [2009] O.J. No. 1716 (S.C.) [Korody], the owner’s testimony was held to contain numerous shortcomings and inconsistencies, especially with respect to the driver’s previous use of the vehicle at issue. On the totality of the evidence therefore, it was ultimately held that the driver assumed that he had the implied consent of the owner and was objectively justified in making that assumption. The issue of implied consent was decided after a trial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.