Does the driver of a vehicle have to prove that he has the implied consent of the owner?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Searay v. Tripp, 2013 ONSC 7597 (CanLII):

Furthermore, in Korody v. Bell, [2009] O.J. No. 1716 (S.C.) [Korody], the owner’s testimony was held to contain numerous shortcomings and inconsistencies, especially with respect to the driver’s previous use of the vehicle at issue. On the totality of the evidence therefore, it was ultimately held that the driver assumed that he had the implied consent of the owner and was objectively justified in making that assumption. The issue of implied consent was decided after a trial.

Other Questions


If the driver of a car is found to be a registered owner of the vehicle, can the driver also be found to have the consent of the other driver? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will implied consent be considered to be implied consent? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a vehicle is being driven without the consent of the driver? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will implied consent be implied in a motor vehicle case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for giving consent to drive a vehicle without giving the owner explicit instructions? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the term owner include the registered owner and the actual owner? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a father have to be identified as the registered owner of the vehicle in the purchase agreement of a motor vehicle? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining liability for a following driver who runs into another vehicle from the rear of the vehicle? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a daughter have implied consent to her unlicensed father to drive her vehicle by leaving it in her parents’ driveway? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motor vehicle in the possession of another person without the owner's consent? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.