How have the courts interpreted the warranty of a glue manufacturer's product?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Borgo Upholstery et al v. AG of Canada, 2003 NSSC 32 (CanLII):
In Thornett & Fehr v. Beers & Son, [1919] 1 K.B. 486 the buyers made a cursory inspection of some barrels of glue, without opening any, though they were invited to open them. This ousted the implied warranty of merchantable quality.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of taxation statutes? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How has the Court interpreted the meaning of s.23(2) of the Criminal Code? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does a company that manufactures vehicles in Canada have product liability obligations under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the admissions made in the settlement agreement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for interpreting section 3 of the National Statutory Interpretation Guidelines? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the terms of the minutes of a settlement agreement where a husband and wife's insurance policies were to be revoked? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the law on title to after-acquired goods in the absence of fraud? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a shareholder's agreement in a transfer of shares? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the argument that solicitor-client privilege is not absolute? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of a contract where a lot of land is excluded? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
