How have courts interpreted the interpretation of taxation statutes?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Romad Developments Ltd. v. Nova Scotia (Assessment), 2008 NSSC 260 (CanLII):
Any ambiguity as to whether taxation statutes are to be interpreted as all other statutes - that is, remedially or purposively, was resolved by Quebec v. Notre-Dame de Bonsecours.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted the meaning of words in the construction of statutes? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard for an administrative tribunal's interpretation of a statute by its own statute? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How has the Court interpreted the meaning of s.23(2) of the Criminal Code? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the admissions made in the settlement agreement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
When will the court defer or delay a permanent care decision until the maximum time limit prescribed by statute has expired? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the terms of the minutes of a settlement agreement where a husband and wife's insurance policies were to be revoked? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a shareholder's agreement in a transfer of shares? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the law on title to after-acquired goods in the absence of fraud? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the argument that solicitor-client privilege is not absolute? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for statutory interpretation of the words in the context of a statute? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
