In my opinion a person cannot entice another to do something with the representation, explicit or implicit, that they will be paid for their services and then upon completion deny payment on the basis of no contract. It is fraud on the part of the building owner or his agent to request alterations to the contract and then refuse payment on the ground that the expenditure was incurred without proper authority: Hill v. South Staffordshire Ry. Co. (1865), 12 L.T. 63.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.