In Thalang above, it was found that the officer based the H&C assessment on the wrong test. The officer’s assessment was based on risk, which was a PRRA criteria, not an H&C criteria. The proper H&C criteria are unusual and undeserved or disproportionate hardship (see Liyanage v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1045 (CanLII), Pinter v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 296 (CanLII)). I am concerned that that is what happened here.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.