The general rule laid clown on the subject of compensation is that where the vendor is able to perform the contract in its substance, but is unable to perform it literally in all its parts, he may yet sue the purchaser for its specific performance; but, on the other hand, when a vendor has not substantially all he has contracted to sell, he cannot sue for specific performance, although the purchaser may generally insist on taking all the vendor has (Rutherford v. Acton-Adams [1915] A.C. 866, 84 L.J.P.C. 238, Lord Haldane, at p. 243).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.