What is the expertise factor in determining a standard of review?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Fenske v. Alberta (Minister of Environment), 2002 ABCA 135 (CanLII):

However, although the expertise factor has been described by Iacobucci J. in Canada v. Southam Inc., 1997 CanLII 385 (SCC), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 748 at 773 as: "... the most important of the factors that a court must consider in settling on a standard of review..." it is, nonetheless, only one of four factors that must be assessed and balanced. It does not trump the other three, nor does the absence of reasons weigh against a high degree of deference where the expertise of the decision maker can be ascertained by other means.

Other Questions


What is the standard of review in the context of standard review on mixed fact and law? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review for the purpose of determining whether a trial judge made a palpable and overriding error? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining the standard of review under the privative clause? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by the reviewing judge in an administrative law case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the appropriate standard of review for the purpose of determining whether a claim has been successful at the Court of Appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
What factors are considered to be determinative in determining whether a medical malpractice case is successful or unsuccessful? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appellate court reviewing a trial decision? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review under appeal law and what is the scope of review? (Alberta, Canada)
What factors must the reviewing court consider in determining whether a decision is final or subject to appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the standard factors for determining damages for defamation? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.