What is the test for establishing that a party has committed acts in breach of a contract?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Lensen v. Lensen, 1984 CanLII 2424 (SK CA):
This test was adopted in Wakeham v. Mackenzie, [1968] 1 W.L.R. 1175, at p. 1181. I conclude that these English authorities take the view that the acts “need not unequivocally refer to the contract in question but must prove the existence of some contract and be consistent with the one alleged.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the liability of a party in breach of a contract when the contract is breached? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What remedies are available to a party to a contract where the other party fails to complete the entire contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the liability of a party in breach of a contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the terms of a contract where the contract is not enforceable and the contract does not specify terms? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a contract be made even if the contract is more precise than the contract itself? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there was connivance between the parties in the context of the definition of a party to a marriage contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for interpreting a contract where a clause in the contract requires a party to pay 100,000 of its covenants to pay £100,000? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a common form of a contract binding upon one of the parties to the same contract whether he or she reads it or not? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the addition of words “addition” to a contract between the parties affect the contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a party and a party have to pay additional costs to a mortgage? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
