How have courts interpreted the terms of a contract where the contract is not enforceable and the contract does not specify terms?

Saskatchewan, Canada

The following excerpt is from Newton v Graham, 2011 SKQB 423 (CanLII):

Implying terms to contracts and to conditions precedent has often been done by courts where it is obvious and necessary for the purpose of carrying out the party’s intentions. As Lambert J.A. stated in Wiebe v. Bobsien, supra, at paras. 17 and 18:

Other Questions

Does a vendor have to rescind the terms of a contract when the vendor has terminated the contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a contract enforceable if the contract is expressly or by implication forbidden by common or statute law? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in relation to the interpretation of the text-books and the various legal principles used by the Court of Appeal to determine whether an agent is bound by the contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an essential term of a contract enforceable? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a contract be made even if the contract is more precise than the contract itself? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a contractual interpretation of a contract enforceable only for palpable or overriding errors? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If a contract to sell peas has a description clause that says that the peas are not ordered or sold by description, can the contract still be enforceable? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for interpreting a contract where a clause in the contract requires a party to pay 100,000 of its covenants to pay £100,000? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted warranty provisions in a horse sale contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted oral contracts in the context of a servant's claim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)

Whitelogo nobg 300dpi sm

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.